Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- the-ishvara-pathogen [2014/12/07 17:06] – Deiparous mention pinkgothic
+++ the-ishvara-pathogen [2017/11/18 15:22] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Not much is known about **the Ishvara pathogen** at this point, except that 'pathogen' is not the best word to describe it. 'Symbiont' is a conceivable alternate option, but has similar issues. One can imagine reasons to embrace Ishvara as much as to fight or avoid it, but whatever it is, it's nothing entirely simple.
-It was created by //Deiparous Technologies//.
 ===== Name =====
@@ Line 12: / Line 10: @@
 ===== Substance and Purpose =====
-Ishvara in its raw form resembles a black liquid, surface pitted rather than smooth, vaguely crystalline in appearance, albeit not in structure. Aside from a tendency to stick together given slight magnetic properties, Ishvara is probably best likened to sand in actuality. It's inert over any amount of time, possessing no life of its own, needing the steady warmth and biological infrastructure of a host to function. It was artificially created, meant to be a base-line neural augmentation with little to no function of its own, but capable of enabling a whole array of sophisticated sub-augmentations.
+Ishvara in its raw form resembles a black liquid, surface pitted rather than smooth, vaguely crystalline in appearance, albeit not in structure. Aside from a tendency to stick together given slight magnetic properties, Ishvara is probably best likened to sand in actuality. It's inert over any amount of time, possessing no life of its own, needing the steady warmth and biological infrastructure of a host to function. It was artificially created by //Deiparous Technologies//, meant to be a base-line neural augmentation with little to no function of its own, but capable of enabling a whole array of sophisticated sub-augmentations.
 It's probably this expected passivity that let Ishvara get terribly out of hand.